Work

by Jack Mottram, a freelance writer based in Glasgow · About · Contact · Feed

Torsten Lauschmann at GOMA

· ·

Torsten Lausch­mann is a tricky artist to pin down. He’s a pho­to­graph­er­, painter, sculptor and digital artist. He’s performed with various Glasgow bands, busked around Europe with a solar-powered laptop under the name Slender Whiteman, published a web magazine, Egoburger, and authored au­di­o­visu­al editing software. Lausch­mann is also something of a prankster, posing as Professor Hans Peter Niesward of the Institute of Grav­it­a­tion­al Physics he caused a stir online with World Jump Day, a bid to halt global warming with a precisely co-ordinated worldwide leap, and recently alarmed a Glasgow audience expecting a con­ven­tion­al per­for­m­ance by baking bread, while, in­ex­plic­ably, dressed up as a caveman.

His latest solo outing is in­tro­duced with a lengthy quote from Dadaist Francis Picabia. ‘What I like,’ Picabia wrote in an excitable anti-clas­si­cist broadside of 1923, ‘is to invent, to imagine, to make myself a new man every moment, then to forget him, forget ever­yth­ing. We should be equipped with a special eraser, gradually effacing our works and the memory of them’.

It’s a quotation that might well be meant to serve as a manifesto for Lausch­mann’s restless cross-media practice, his tendency to re­lent­lessly revise and reinvent his work. But it also points to the problem with this admirably poly­math­ic, unbounded approach to making art, and the problem with this show: it is rather patchy.

The exhibit opens with Quality (money chord), a vintage elec­tron­ic organ tipped over and harshly lit from above, casting a sharp shadow onto which is projected a busy, flowing animated sequence made up of of numbers and symbols, a pseudo-sci­en­ti­f­ic attempt, perhaps, to define that ‘money chord’ - musician’s slang for the perfect pop pro­gres­sion - leaking out of the old organ. Next comes Pandora’s Ball, another video pro­jec­tion that plays tricks on the viewer. The titular ball is still, and behind it a con­stantly shifting oblong of projected video jerks across the wall, showing dancing feet, lifted from an un­iden­ti­fied song and dance number. Like the im­pos­s­ibly precise pro­jec­tion of numbers into shadow in the piece beside it, Pandora’s Ball has visitors peering, puzzled, in a bid to un­der­stand its mechanics: the ball, it turns out, is not quite there, a sculp­tur­al wall drawing, fleshed out with a projected surface that, somehow, obscures the moving footage of feet.

These projected puzzles are followed by a simple sculpture, Crystal Swingball, which is exactly that: a pint-sized version of the garden game, hastily assembled on a base made of dollops of greasy oil paint from a bamboo stick, a bit of string and the titular crystal. It doesn’t look much fun to play with, though - one swing, and the sharp-edged crystal would have your eye out.

This sort of darkly humorous reversal appears again in Fear Among Sci­ent­ists, for my money, the best piece here, and certainly the funniest. Numbers crudely carved out of plywood set out the sum 3 - 1 = 2. But look closely, and Lausch­mann has painted in the shadows the numbers cast, leaving the total intact, but in­tro­du­cing an im­pos­s­ible system of ar­ith­met­ic. According to the shadow numbers, 8 + 7 = 2.

Two nearby pho­to­graphs are similarly perverse. The Curtain (13 Seconds) and The Curtain (27 Seconds) are still pho­to­graphs of an earlier work, The Curtain, a two-di­men­sion­al but dis­t­inc­tly sculp­tur­al video work that saw stripes of muted colours slowly shifting across a large, wide screen, sug­gest­ing drapes blowing in a breeze, the movement of each stripe suggested by the movement of its neighbour, according to the the al­gor­ith­ms of math­em­at­i­ci­an John Horton Conway’s cellular automaton, the Game of Life. Is this, like the shadowy equation, a joke? Pre­ser­v­ing an arbitrary moment in the pro­gres­sion of a piece that rests on time and movement, certainly seems an odd tactic.

Finally, with related works set beside the entrance and exit of GOMA’s corridor-like upstairs ex­hib­i­tion space, Lausch­mann changes tack again, bookend­ing his show with images of his partner, fellow artist Cathy Wilkes, and of their son.

Lausch­mann has looked to his nearest and dearest before. Mother And Child, a loving ‘digital portrait’ of his family fast asleep, was a rich, layered piece of work, at once a con­tem­por­ary reworking of religious icon­o­graphy, and a private, intimate moment exposed to the world, both generous and dis­com­fort­ing, casting the viewer as voyeur. It was, too, a new kind of portrait, a video loop projected onto a wall drawing, its painterly qualities un­der­mined by the oc­ca­sion­al stirrings of the sleeping pair.

Compared to a piece like Mother And Child, the Polaroid pho­to­graphs gathered here seem a little slight. The first is a simple portrait of a slightly dis­trac­ted Wilkes, gazing off into the middle distance. The four images that close the show - one showing Lausch­mann’s son playing with his toy lamb, another is of the boy mucking about, wrapping himself in the living room curtains, a third snap sees a pair of toy horses discarded on the floor, while the fourth image documents pencil lines on a wall, marking the growing child’s height - might well have formed a quiet, oblique portrait of the artist’s, his son, their re­la­tion­ship and life at home, but Lausch­mann takes, arguably, a step too far, training twin spot­lights on the pho­to­graphs, po­s­i­tioned so that their light is cast in the shape of a heart. It’s a mawkish, sen­ti­ment­al moment. Or terribly sweet. Either way, it seems typical of Lausch­mann to be exploring themes - fath­er­hood, family, love - that are rarely found in the con­tem­por­ary art gallery. It also casts Crystal Swingball in a new light, recasting it as a thought­ful piece about paternal re­s­pon­s­ib­il­ity and anxiety, rather than a one-note joke. (Lausch­mann counsels against such in­ter­pretet­a­tion, it should be said, warning in a note ac­com­pa­ny­ing the ex­hib­i­tion that the meaning of his work ‘will disappear every time one asks, “But what is it about?”’)

It is perhaps unfair to complain when an artist like Lausch­mann, who very de­lib­er­ately casts his artist’s net wide, produces a show that flits from theme to theme. But this is less a show than a Lausch­mann sampler - unlike his last, cohesive solo exhibit at Mary Mary, or the wonderful, immersive in­stal­l­a­tion, Suburbia in 3D: Chasing but­ter­flies, mounted at Tran­s­mis­sion in 2004 - and it seems a shame that the works here, whether focussed on the family, geeky gags, or inventive fusions of projected video, sculpture and drawing, have been set up to fight each other for the viewer’s attention.

This review was first published in The Herald on March 28th, 2008.